Wright v. State

262 S.W.2d 723, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2320

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2172 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 16, 1953·No. No. 26703·Published

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of robbery by assault, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of robbery by assault, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Wright v. State, 262 S.W.2d 723, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2320 (Tex. 1953).

Pincite

262 S.W.2d 723 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.