Wright v. State

271 S.W. 1119, 100 Tex. Crim. 561, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 577
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Tex. Crim. 513
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 6, 1925·No. No. 9409.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

Under an indictment regularly presented, and faulty in neither form nor substance, the appellant was convicted of the offense of theft; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appeal is supported by neither bills of exception nor statement of facts. No error has been pointed out or perceived.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 271 S.W. 1119, 100 Tex. Crim. 561, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 577 (Tex. 1925).

271 S.W. 1119 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.