Wright v. State
This text of Wright v. State (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Michael A. Wright, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal from Pickens County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2005-MO-057
Submitted November 16, 2005 - Filed December 5, 2005
AFFIRMED
Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Karen C. Ratigan, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Rollison v. State, 346 S.C. 506, 510, 552 S.E.2d 290, 292 (2001) (holding that a defendant is free to negotiate a plea bargain and may plead guilty to a charge for which he has been indicted, but of which he is not guilty, when the plea agreement is entered into knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily).
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur. WALLER, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wright v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-sc-2005.