Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wright v. State

1956 OK CR 86, 301 P.2d 373, 1956 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 223

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1956

DocketNo. A-12331

StatusPublished

This text of 1956 OK CR 86 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. State, 1956 OK CR 86, 301 P.2d 373, 1956 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 223 (Okla. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

BRETT, Judge.

John Thomas Wright, plaintiff in error, defendant below, was charged in the Municipal Criminal Court of City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, with the offense of operating a motor vehicle on a public street of the City of Tulsa on May 8, 1955, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He was tried without a jury by the Honorable Harry Seaton, Judge, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $100. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The case was set for oral argument on July 16, 1956. No briefs were filed and said cause was submitted on oral argument and the record. We have examined the record and find the same free from reversible error.

While the evidence herein is conflicting, the same is sufficient to sustain the trial judge’s findings of fact. Judgment is affirmed.

POWELL, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRETT, Judge.

John Thomas Wright, plaintiff in error, defendant below, was charged in the Municipal Criminal Court of City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, with the offense of operating a motor vehicle on a public street of the City of Tulsa on May 8, 1955, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He was tried without a jury by the Honorable Harry Seaton, Judge, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $100. Judgment and sentence were entered accordingly, from which this appeal has been perfected.

The case was set for oral argument on July 16, 1956. No briefs were filed and said cause was submitted on oral argument and the record. We have examined the record and find the same free from reversible error.

While the evidence herein is conflicting, the same is sufficient to sustain the trial judge’s findings of fact. Judgment is affirmed.

POWELL, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1956 OK CR 86, 301 P.2d 373, 1956 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-oklacrimapp-1956.