Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wright v. State

1932 OK CR 111, 11 P.2d 1119, 53 Okla. Crim. 341, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 104

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Okla. Crim. 393 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 28, 1932·No. No. A-8318.·Published

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The officers with a search warrant found less than one quart of whisky. This quantity not making a prima facie case under the statutes and there being no other competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is reversed.

EDWARDS, J., concurs. DAYENPOET, P. J., absent, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The officers with a search warrant found less than one quart of whisky. This quantity not making a prima facie case under the statutes and there being no other competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is reversed.

EDWARDS, J., concurs. DAYENPOET, P. J., absent, not participating.

Wright v. State, 1932 OK CR 111, 11 P.2d 1119, 53 Okla. Crim. 341, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Okla. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

1932 OK CR 111 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.