Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wright v. State

1932 OK CR 111, 11 P.2d 1119, 53 Okla. Crim. 341, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 104

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 28, 1932

DocketNo. A-8318.

StatusPublished

This text of 1932 OK CR 111 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. State, 1932 OK CR 111, 11 P.2d 1119, 53 Okla. Crim. 341, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Okla. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The officers with a search warrant found less than one quart of whisky. This quantity not making a prima facie case under the statutes and there being no other competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is reversed.

EDWARDS, J., concurs. DAYENPOET, P. J., absent, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The officers with a search warrant found less than one quart of whisky. This quantity not making a prima facie case under the statutes and there being no other competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is reversed.

EDWARDS, J., concurs. DAYENPOET, P. J., absent, not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK CR 111, 11 P.2d 1119, 53 Okla. Crim. 341, 1932 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-oklacrimapp-1932.