Wright v. State
409 S.W.3d 580, 2013 WL 5375496, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1224 →
Opinion
ORDER
Brian Wright appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of sexual abuse and false imprisonment. Wright contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to present evidence that would have aided his credibility and provided him with a viable defense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 409 S.W.3d 580, 2013 WL 5375496, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
409 S.W.3d 580 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.