Wright v. State

313 S.W.3d 731, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 874, 2010 WL 2483276
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 22, 2010·No. WD 70939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Sean Wright appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy and second-degree statutory sodomy and consecutive sentences of life and seven years imprisonment, respectively. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 313 S.W.3d 731, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 874, 2010 WL 2483276 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

313 S.W.3d 731 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sean Wright v. Michael Bowersox
720 F.3d 979 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Gazaway v. State
313 S.W.3d 731 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)