Wright v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wright v. State

206 S.W.3d 377, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1761, 2006 WL 3361124

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 2006

DocketNo. ED 87255

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 S.W.3d 377 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. State, 206 S.W.3d 377, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1761, 2006 WL 3361124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Wright (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 on the merits after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[378]*378The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI