Wright v. State

108 S.W.3d 656, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2002 WL 484848
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1978
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 2002·No. No. WD 60388·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Brian Wright appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. Wright was originally charged with second degree murder, § 565.021, RSMo 2000,1 and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo. The State charged that Wright caused the death of James Sutton by striking him on the head with a beer bottle. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting [657]*657the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 108 S.W.3d 656, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2002 WL 484848 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

108 S.W.3d 656 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.