Wright v. State

5 Blackf. 358, 1840 Ind. LEXIS 65
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 2, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 5 Blackf. 358 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. State, 5 Blackf. 358, 1840 Ind. LEXIS 65 (Ind. 1840).

Opinion

Sullivan, J.

The defendant was indicted for living in open and notorious adultery with a certain woman, &c. [359]*359Plea, not guilty. On the trial, the ju^Bpund the defendant guilty. Motion for a new trial overruHl, and judgment on the verdict.

J. Pitcher, for the plaintiff. W. J. Peaslee, for the state.

The testimony did not prove a “living together” as is required by the statute, but simply, if it proved any thing, an occasional illicit intercourse between the defendant and the woman named in the -indictment. The offence consists in an open and notorious cohabitation, and unless it be of that character, it is not indictable.'

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, and the verdict set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richey v. State
87 N.E. 1032 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
Brevaldo v. State
21 Fla. 789 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1886)
State v. Stephens
63 Ind. 542 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Sullivan v. State
32 Ark. 187 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1877)
State v. Crowner
56 Mo. 147 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)
Gaylor v. McHenry
15 Ind. 383 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1860)
State v. Gartrell
14 Ind. 280 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Blackf. 358, 1840 Ind. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-ind-1840.