Wright v. State
This text of 5 Blackf. 358 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was indicted for living in open and notorious adultery with a certain woman, &c. [359]*359Plea, not guilty. On the trial, the ju^Bpund the defendant guilty. Motion for a new trial overruHl, and judgment on the verdict.
The testimony did not prove a “living together” as is required by the statute, but simply, if it proved any thing, an occasional illicit intercourse between the defendant and the woman named in the -indictment. The offence consists in an open and notorious cohabitation, and unless it be of that character, it is not indictable.'
The judgment is reversed, and the verdict set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Blackf. 358, 1840 Ind. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-ind-1840.