Wright v. State

455 S.E.2d 88, 216 Ga. App. 486, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 990, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 203
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 1995
DocketA94A2456
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 455 S.E.2d 88 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. State, 455 S.E.2d 88, 216 Ga. App. 486, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 990, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 203 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was tried before a jury and found guilty of incest, rape and aggravated sodomy. This appeal followed the denial of defendant’s motion for new trial. Held:

1. Defendant first contends the trial court erred in admitting incriminating statements he uttered in the presence of a law enforcement officer after he refused the officer’s requests for defendant to execute a form indicating waiver of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694). This enumeration provides no grounds for reversal as any error in admission of these statements was not only cumulative of other admissible evidence, it is harmless because of overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. McLendon v. State, 259 Ga. 778, 780 (4) (387 SE2d 133).

2. Defendant complains in enumerations 3 and 4 that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the testimony of two witnesses (defendant’s son and his brother) as to the victim’s motive for accusing defendant of committing the crimes charged. In his third enumeration, defendant contends the trial court “erred in refusing to admit into evidence testimony of defendant as to the diagnosis of his own illness.” These enumerations present nothing for review as defendant failed to proffer the testimony which was allegedly improperly excluded by the trial court. Harris v. State, 263 Ga. 526, 527 (1) (435 SE2d 669).

*487 Decided March 6, 1995. Ernest C. Tubbs, Jr., for appellant. Ralph L. Van Pelt, Jr., District Attorney, Melodie S. Bedford, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Pope, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milan v. State
667 S.E.2d 267 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Pendarvis Construction Corp. v. Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority
520 S.E.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Dent v. Candler Hospital, Inc.
512 S.E.2d 392 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Tukes v. State
511 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Nunnery v. State
506 S.E.2d 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Dennis v. State
486 S.E.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Tucker v. State
474 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Hight v. State
472 S.E.2d 113 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 S.E.2d 88, 216 Ga. App. 486, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 990, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-gactapp-1995.