Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wright v. State

164 S.E.2d 318, 118 Ga. App. 527, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 955

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1968·No. 43841·Published

Opinion

Eberhardt, Judge.

The only question raised is whether there is sufficient proof of venue in the record in this case to support the conviction. We conclude that there is, since it positively appears from the testimony that the Belk-Rhodes Company, the business unlawfully broken into, was located at 238-242 Broad Street, Rome, in Floyd County.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eberhardt, Judge.

The only question raised is whether there is sufficient proof of venue in the record in this case to support the conviction. We conclude that there is, since it positively appears from the testimony that the Belk-Rhodes Company, the business unlawfully broken into, was located at 238-242 Broad Street, Rome, in Floyd County.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Wright v. State, 164 S.E.2d 318, 118 Ga. App. 527, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 955 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

164 S.E.2d 318 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.