Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wright v. State

71 Ga. App. 520

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 20, 1944

Docket30514

StatusPublished

This text of 71 Ga. App. 520 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. State, 71 Ga. App. 520 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The certiorari contains the general grounds only. The record discloses that the evidence for the State, if credible, was sufficient to support the verdict. The judge did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Gardner, J., concur. Frank A. Bowers, for plaintiff in error. Bindley W. Gamp, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, and Durwood T. Pye, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The certiorari contains the general grounds only. The record discloses that the evidence for the State, if credible, was sufficient to support the verdict. The judge did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Gardner, J., concur. Frank A. Bowers, for plaintiff in error. Bindley W. Gamp, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, and Durwood T. Pye, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 Ga. App. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-gactapp-1944.