Wright v. State

91 S.E. 928, 19 Ga. App. 618, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 260
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 23, 1917
Docket8410
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 928 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. State, 91 S.E. 928, 19 Ga. App. 618, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 260 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The only assignment of error being that the evidence did not authorize the verdict, and there being some evidence upon which the jury could base their finding, and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, this court can not set the verdict aside. Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 964); Cottle v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 809) ; Alexander v. State, 1 Ga. App. 289 (57 S. E. 996).

Judgment affirmed.

1Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. State
57 S.E. 996 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Thomas v. State
66 S.E. 964 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Cottle v. State
66 S.E. 809 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 928, 19 Ga. App. 618, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-gactapp-1917.