Wright v. State
91 S.E. 928, 19 Ga. App. 618, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 260
Opinion
The only assignment of error being that the evidence did not authorize the verdict, and there being some evidence upon which the jury could base their finding, and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, this court can not set the verdict aside. Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 964); Cottle v. State, 7 Ga. App. 337 (66 S. E. 809) ; Alexander v. State, 1 Ga. App. 289 (57 S. E. 996).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 91 S.E. 928, 19 Ga. App. 618, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 260 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
91 S.E. 928 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alexander v. State
57 S.E. 996 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Thomas v. State
66 S.E. 964 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Cottle v. State
66 S.E. 809 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)