Wright v. State
166 So. 3d 189, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8047, 2015 WL 3397146
This text of 166 So. 3d 189 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wright v. State, 166 So. 3d 189, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8047, 2015 WL 3397146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Johnson v. State, 695 So.2d 787, 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (“[Fjailure to instruct on necessarily lesser-included offenses (even category 1 lesser-included offenses) in a non-capital case is not fundamental error. To preserve such an error for appellate review, the defendant must request such an instruction and object to the trial court’s refusal to give one.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Johnson v. State
695 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 So. 3d 189, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8047, 2015 WL 3397146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.