Wright v. State

48 So. 3d 926, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17925, 2010 WL 4705104
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2010·No. 1D10-4195·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the denial of grounds one through six. However, we reverse and remand the denial of ground seven and direct the trial court to strike that portion of the appellant’s sentence imposing a $5,000 fine. See King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996) (holding that a trial court may not impose a fine under section 775.083 when imposing a habitual felony offender sentence under section 775.084), receded from on other grounds in Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173 (Fla.2001).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED AND REMANDED in part.

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 48 So. 3d 926, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17925, 2010 WL 4705104 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

48 So. 3d 926 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruz v. State
73 So. 3d 300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)