Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wright v. State

Wright v. State

929 So. 2d 647, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7422, 2006 WL 1310390
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 864 So. 2d 1153 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2006·No. No. 1D05-5236·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla.2003) (holding that pro se pleadings from defendants who are represented by counsel in the pending criminal proceedings are unauthorized).

DAVIS, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 929 So. 2d 647, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7422, 2006 WL 1310390 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 647 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)