Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wright v. State

777 So. 2d 1092, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 356, 2001 WL 43065

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 2001

DocketNo. 5D00-2222

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 777 So. 2d 1092 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. State, 777 So. 2d 1092, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 356, 2001 WL 43065 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Donald Eugene Wright, pro se, appealed the trial court’s denial of Wright’s Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. Wright was incarcerated at the time of filing his petition with the trial court. Therefore, he was a custodial claimant and a writ of coram nobis was unavailable to him. See Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999).

We treat Wright’s appeal as an appeal from the summary denial of a Rule 3.850 motion. The trial court properly attached portions of the trial record to its denial and that record reveals that contrary to the allegations of the petition, Wright was allowed to talk with his defense counsel at a recess during his cross-examination. Therefore, the trial court properly denied Wright’s petition.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI