Wright v. State

765 So. 2d 954, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11360, 2000 WL 1252073
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 2000·No. No. 1D98-1141·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction for robbery with a firearm, the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment as a prison releasee reoffender and as a habitual felony offender. We reject the appellant’s constitutional challenges to the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Punishment Act, section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997). See State v. Cotton, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S463, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000). But we agree with his further argument that, in light of our decision in Walls v. State, 765 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), it was improper to impose appellant’s life sentence under both the [955]*955habitual felony offender statute and the prison releasee reoffender statute. Accordingly, we strike the habitual felony offender designation.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 765 So. 2d 954, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11360, 2000 WL 1252073 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 954 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. State
772 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)