Wright v. State
510 So. 2d 1159, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1954, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9867
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 1987·No. No. 86-1531·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s admission of hearsay in the police officer’s testimony concerning the alleged victim’s description of the defendant was error; we conclude, however, that the error was harmless because the officer’s testimony impeached rather than [1160]*1160bolstered the victim’s testimony, and thus, under the standards of State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), no prejudice appears. Silveira-Hernandez v. State, 495 So.2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Appellant’s other point lacks merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 510 So. 2d 1159, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1954, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
510 So. 2d 1159 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A.O., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023