Wright v. State
Opinion
We have for review an appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), from a judgment and sentence for two counts of burglary and one count of grand theft. Although we affirm the conviction, we must reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. As the written sentence reads now, it would appear that the incar-cerative term is to run consecutively to the probationary terms. Consequently, we remand for the trial court to correct the written sentence to conform to its oral pronouncement that the concurrent 4-year terms of probation are to run consecutively to the 3-year prison term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
509 So. 2d 405 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.