Wright v. State

509 So. 2d 405, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1666, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1425
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 1987·No. No. BP-82·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

We have for review an appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), from a judgment and sentence for two counts of burglary and one count of grand theft. Although we affirm the conviction, we must reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. As the written sentence reads now, it would appear that the incar-cerative term is to run consecutively to the probationary terms. Consequently, we remand for the trial court to correct the written sentence to conform to its oral pronouncement that the concurrent 4-year terms of probation are to run consecutively to the 3-year prison term.

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 509 So. 2d 405, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1666, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

509 So. 2d 405 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)