Wright v. State

275 So. 2d 574, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7085
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 So. 2d 890
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1973·No. No. 72-1382·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 275 So. 2d 574, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7085 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

275 So. 2d 574 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)