Wright v. State

218 So. 2d 500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4681
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1969·No. No. 68-574·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO QUASH

PER CURIAM.

The state has moved to quash this appeal, which is from an order of the circuit court denying a post-conviction motion for discharge under Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

Petitioner-appellant is currently in custody serving a valid sentence in state prison imposed on September 1, 1967, as the result of a jury verdict of guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony.

In his motion for post-conviction relief, petitioner has attacked a judgment and sentence dated December 11, 1957, in which he was found guilty of exhibiting obscene literature. In petitioner’s motion for post-conviction relief, he has not attacked the validity of the sentence for which he is currently in custody.

Therefore, the motion to quash is granted under the authority of Johnson v. State, Fla.1966, 184 So.2d 161; Escue v. State, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 524, and Yates v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 340.

LILES, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 218 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

218 So. 2d 500 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
184 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Escue v. State
192 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Yates v. State
199 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)