Wright v. State

931 S.W.2d 107, 326 Ark. 276, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 518
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 327 Ark. 558
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 14, 1996·No. CR 96-1133·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Johnny Wright, by his attorney, Paul M. Herrod, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The Clerk refused to docket the record concerning Mr. Wright’s conviction because it revealed that the notice of appeal was untimely filed. Mr. Herrod accepts responsibility for the failure. We treat the motion for rule on the clerk as a motion for belated appeal in this circumstance.

Failure of counsel to perfect an appeal for a defendant who wishes to appeal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel and good cause for granting a belated appeal. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is granted.

A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 931 S.W.2d 107, 326 Ark. 276, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 518 (Ark. 1996).

931 S.W.2d 107 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.