Wright v. State
This text of 709 So. 2d 1115 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
The appellant, Ronald Lee Wright, was convicted of trafficking in cannabis, a violation of § 13A-12-231, Code of Alabama 1975. We affirmed the appellant’s conviction by unpublished memorandum on February 9, 1996, after holding that anticipatory search warrants were lawful in Alabama. The Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Wright, 709 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1996), held that anticipatory search warrants were not lawful in Alabama and reversed this court’s judgment. The Supreme Court ordered us to remand this case to the Circuit Court for Tuscaloosa County “to allow the trial court to make the initial determination whether the State could make a sufficient showing of exigent circumstances to justify a warrantless search.” Wright, 709 So.2d at 1114.
This ease is remanded to the Circuit Court for Tuscaloosa County for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Note from the reporter of decisions: On August 22, 1997, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion. On October 17, 1997, that court denied rehearing, without opinion. On January 16, 1998, the supreme Court denied the defendant’s certiorari petition, without opinion (1970193).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 So. 2d 1115, 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 31, 1997 WL 16127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-alacrimapp-1997.