Wright v. State
Opinion
AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
The appellant, Ronald Lee Wright, was convicted of trafficking in cannabis, a violation of § 13A-12-231, Code of Alabama 1975. We affirmed the appellant’s conviction by unpublished memorandum on February 9, 1996, after holding that anticipatory search warrants were lawful in Alabama. The Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Wright, 709 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1996), held that anticipatory search warrants were not lawful in Alabama and reversed this court’s judgment. The Supreme Court ordered us to remand this case to the Circuit Court for Tuscaloosa County “to allow the trial court to make the initial determination whether the State could make a sufficient showing of exigent circumstances to justify a warrantless search.” Wright, 709 So.2d at 1114.
This ease is remanded to the Circuit Court for Tuscaloosa County for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
709 So. 2d 1115 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.