Wright v. State

709 So. 2d 1115, 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 31, 1997 WL 16127
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 17, 1997
DocketCR-94-1668
StatusPublished

This text of 709 So. 2d 1115 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. State, 709 So. 2d 1115, 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 31, 1997 WL 16127 (Ala. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Ronald Lee Wright, was convicted of trafficking in cannabis, a violation of § 13A-12-231, Code of Alabama 1975. We affirmed the appellant’s conviction by unpublished memorandum on February 9, 1996, after holding that anticipatory search warrants were lawful in Alabama. The Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Wright, 709 So.2d 1111 (Ala.1996), held that anticipatory search warrants were not lawful in Alabama and reversed this court’s judgment. The Supreme Court ordered us to remand this case to the Circuit Court for Tuscaloosa County “to allow the trial court to make the initial determination whether the State could make a sufficient showing of exigent circumstances to justify a warrantless search.” Wright, 709 So.2d at 1114.

This ease is remanded to the Circuit Court for Tuscaloosa County for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wright
709 So. 2d 1111 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 So. 2d 1115, 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 31, 1997 WL 16127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-alacrimapp-1997.