Wright v. State
312 So. 2d 421, 294 Ala. 99, 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1151
Opinion
Writ denied. Although we deny the writ we feel constrained to comment that the better practice would be for the trial judge to exclude the jury when making inquiry of a witness concerning whether the witness was under indictment or not, as was done in the instant case. Neither should we be understood as approving language of the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals in this case, in its entirety. See In re Clara Lowery, alias v. State, Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Attorney General, 291 Ala. 787, 286 So.2d 67.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wright v. State, 312 So. 2d 421, 294 Ala. 99, 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1151 (Ala. 1975).
312 So. 2d 421 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White v. State
546 So. 2d 1014 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Cork v. State
433 So. 2d 959 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.
648 P.2d 1192 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1982)
Favors v. State
355 So. 2d 103 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1977)