Wright v. State

182 So. 5, 236 Ala. 263, 1938 Ala. LEXIS 157
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 9, 1938·No. 8 Div. 846.·Published

Opinion

THOMAS, Justice.

The questions presented by this appeal, and argued by counsel for appellant, are fully treated in the opinion of the Court in the case of Weems v. State, Ala.Sup., 182 So. 3, 1 this day decided, and are there determined against the appellant’s contention.

The other questions presented on the record have been examined and we find nothing in them requiring specific treatment or that could authorize a reversal of the judgment of the court.

The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, áffirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 261.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 182 So. 5, 236 Ala. 263, 1938 Ala. LEXIS 157 (Ala. 1938).

182 So. 5 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weems v. State
182 So. 3 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)