Wright v. Snowball

45 Cal. 654
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
DocketNo. 3,619
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 45 Cal. 654 (Wright v. Snowball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Snowball, 45 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1873).

Opinion

By the Court:

The appéal is taken only from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. It nowhere appears that a notice of intention to move for a new trial was given, by the appellant or waived by the respondent by appearance to the [655]*655motion, or in any other manner, and it is objected, and we think well objected, by the respondent, that in the absence of such a notice or waiver, the order denying a new trial cannot be reviewed here.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.
72 P. 309 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)
Pico v. Cohn
20 P. 706 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Dominguez v. Mascotti
15 P. 773 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Street v. Lemon Mill & Mining Co.
9 Nev. 251 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cal. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-snowball-cal-1873.