Wright v. Snowball
This text of 45 Cal. 654 (Wright v. Snowball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appéal is taken only from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. It nowhere appears that a notice of intention to move for a new trial was given, by the appellant or waived by the respondent by appearance to the [655]*655motion, or in any other manner, and it is objected, and we think well objected, by the respondent, that in the absence of such a notice or waiver, the order denying a new trial cannot be reviewed here.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 Cal. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-snowball-cal-1873.