Wright v. Snowball

45 Cal. 654
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·No. No. 3,619·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The appéal is taken only from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. It nowhere appears that a notice of intention to move for a new trial was given, by the appellant or waived by the respondent by appearance to the [655]*655motion, or in any other manner, and it is objected, and we think well objected, by the respondent, that in the absence of such a notice or waiver, the order denying a new trial cannot be reviewed here.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Snowball, 45 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1873).

45 Cal. 654 (Wright v. Snowball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.
72 P. 309 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)
Pico v. Cohn
20 P. 706 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Dominguez v. Mascotti
15 P. 773 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Street v. Lemon Mill & Mining Co.
9 Nev. 251 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1874)