Wright v. Simpson

38 N.W. 11, 70 Mich. 146
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 3, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 N.W. 11 (Wright v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Simpson, 38 N.W. 11, 70 Mich. 146 (Mich. 1888).

Opinion

Long, J.

Petition for mandamus.

The facts in this case are substantially the same as in Pach, Woods <& Co. v. Circuit Judge, ante, 135, and this case must be ruled by that.

The writ must be denied.

Sherwood, O. J., Chahplin and Morse, JJ., concurred. Campbell, J,, did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald J Trump v. Board of State Canvassers
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016
Attorney General ex rel. Garthe v. Campbell
89 N.W. 950 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 N.W. 11, 70 Mich. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-simpson-mich-1888.