Wright v. Shea
This text of 634 So. 2d 364 (Wright v. Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Wright, Hilton; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 268-605.
Granted. The amended sentence is vacated, and the district court is ordered to resen-tence the relator in open court. To the extent that resentencing will take place before the same judge who imposed relator’s original sentence, the court need not conduct an evidentiary hearing but should determine for the record its original sentencing intent and resentence the relator in accord with the considerations set forth in State v. Desdunes, 579 So.2d 452 (La.1991); State v. Washington, 578 So.2d 1150 (La.1991); State ex rel. Jackson v. Smith, 578 So.2d 1150 (La.1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
634 So. 2d 364, 1994 La. LEXIS 398, 1994 WL 40911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-shea-la-1994.