Wright v. Shafter

48 Cal. 275
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
DocketNo. 4,310
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 48 Cal. 275 (Wright v. Shafter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Shafter, 48 Cal. 275 (Cal. 1874).

Opinion

By the Court:

The plaintiffs claimed, and in the Court below obtained relief on the ground that a mistake occurred upon their part, in attempting to effect a redemption from the Sheriff’s sale on foreclosure of a mortgage. It is well settled that a complaint claiming relief on the ground of mistake must not only distinctly aver the fact of the mistake, but also set [277]*277forth the circumstances under which it occurred in so far as those circumstances may be necessary to present a case within the rule of equity upon which relief is granted. Tested by this rule, the complaint here is radically defective,- and the demurrer should have been sustained.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and cause remanded, with direction to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Totten v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
176 Cal. App. 2d 440 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
McClure v. Cerati
194 P.2d 46 (California Court of Appeal, 1948)
Weaver v. Ratcliffe
3 P.2d 20 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Auerbach v. Healy
161 P. 1157 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
Glasmann v. O'Donnell
6 Utah 446 (Utah Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Cal. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-shafter-cal-1874.