Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided January 12, 2026·No. 25-0187V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-187V

STACEY WRIGHT, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: November 20, 2025 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Crystal Fialkowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On January 31, 2025, Stacey Wilson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving an influenza vaccination on October 11, 2023. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 18, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On November 19, 2025, Respondent filed the attached joint stipulation, 3 requesting that I issued a decision awarding $52,671.62 to Petitioner. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

3 Usually, a proffer is filed by Respondent if the parties have reached an informal agreement regarding the

appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded after an entitlement determination. However, in a minority of cases, the parties may choose to file a joint stipulation instead, representing more of a compromise regarding the compensation to be awarded. Stipulation at ¶ 8. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $52,671.62, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

STACEY WRIGHT,

Petitioner, No. 25-187V Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Stacey Wright ("petitioner'') filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the " Vaccine

Program" ). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § I00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a tlu vaccine on October 11 , 2023. 1

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

1 On October 11, 2023, petitioner also received a COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines against COVID-19 are not contained in the Vaccine Injury Table. See42 U.S.C. § 300aa-14 and 42 C.F .R. § 1003(a). Pursuant to the declaration issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 247d-6:t, 247d-6e), claims for alleged injuries from COVID-19 countermeasures, including vaccines, may be compensable under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program ("CICP"). See 85 Fed. Reg. I5198, 15202 (March 17, 2020). 4. Petitioner sustained a left shoulder injury related to vaccination administration

("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table following receipt of the flu vaccine and

experienced the residual effects of a SIRVA injury for more than six months.

5. There is not a preponderance of evidence demonstrating that petitioner's injury is due

to a factor unrelated to vaccination.

6. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on petitioner's behalf as a result of petitioner's condition.

7. Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to compensation under the terms of the Vaccine Act

for her SIRVA Table injury. Therefore, a decision should be entered awarding the compensation

described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $52,671.62 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

I 0. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

2 primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2026).

Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3501
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 247d
42 U.S.C. § 247d
§ 1396
42 U.S.C. § 1396