Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided June 4, 2021·No. 19-659·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-659V UNPUBLISHED

GLADYS WRIGHT, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: April 30, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; HUMAN SERVICES, Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.

Mark Kim Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On May 3, 2019, Gladys Wright filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her Pneumococcal Conjugate (“PCV13”) vaccination on May 6, 2016. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at April 27, 2021, ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5; see Petition at ¶¶ 1, 3-4, 16. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained onset of a SIRVA Table injury within the Table timeframe and further denies that the PCV13 vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged right shoulder injury or any other injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on April 27, 2021, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $55,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 ]n tbe fflniteb ~tates ~ourt of jfeberal ~Iaims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

GLADYS WRIGHT,

Petitioner, Case No. l 9-659V (ECF) V. CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER CORCORAN SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Gladys Wright, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation W1der

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34(the

''Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to

petitioner's receipt of the pnelDllOcoccal 13 (''PCV13") vaccine, which is a vaccine

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the ''Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the PCVl 3 vaccine on May 6, 2016.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a right shoulder injury related to

vaccine administration (''SIRVA") as a resuh of receiving the PCV13 vaccine, and

alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a

civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her alleged injuries.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained the onset of a SIRVA Table

injury within the Table time frame and further denies that the PCVl 3 vaccine caused

petitioner's alleged right shoulder injury or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree

that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered

awarding the compensation descnbed in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision

consistent with the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to

receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Heahh

and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $55,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)(l ), and an application, the parties will submit to further

proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs

incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made

2 or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs,

insurance policies, Federal or State heahh benefits program, (other than Title XIX of the

Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a