Wright v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n

12 Md. 443, 1858 Md. LEXIS 36
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 2, 1858·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Le Grand, C. j.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

We do not discover, on an examination of the record in this case, that John B. Gray has any interest whatever in the question litigated between the parties to this suit, and inasmuch as no relief is prayed against him he was not a necessary party. Whatever rights he may have, he can assert in a proceeding to be instituted by himself. 6 Wheaton, 559, Kerr vs. Watts. 11 Maryland, Rep., 158, Crook vs. Brown.

Decree reversed, and, cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n, 12 Md. 443, 1858 Md. LEXIS 36 (Md. 1858).

12 Md. 443 (Wright v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newark Trust Co. v. Talbot Bank
141 A.2d 516 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)
In re McRae
3 Balt. C. Rep. 55 (Baltimore City Circuit Court, 1909)
Ridgely v. Wilmer
55 A. 488 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1903)
Tavenner v. Barrett
21 W. Va. 656 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)