Wright v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Wright v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n

12 Md. 443, 1858 Md. LEXIS 36

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 2, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 12 Md. 443 (Wright v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n, 12 Md. 443, 1858 Md. LEXIS 36 (Md. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Le Grand, C. j.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

We do not discover, on an examination of the record in this case, that John B. Gray has any interest whatever in the question litigated between the parties to this suit, and inasmuch as no relief is prayed against him he was not a necessary party. Whatever rights he may have, he can assert in a proceeding to be instituted by himself. 6 Wheaton, 559, Kerr vs. Watts. 11 Maryland, Rep., 158, Crook vs. Brown.

Decree reversed, and, cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Le Grand, C. j.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

We do not discover, on an examination of the record in this case, that John B. Gray has any interest whatever in the question litigated between the parties to this suit, and inasmuch as no relief is prayed against him he was not a necessary party. Whatever rights he may have, he can assert in a proceeding to be instituted by himself. 6 Wheaton, 559, Kerr vs. Watts. 11 Maryland, Rep., 158, Crook vs. Brown.

Decree reversed, and, cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Md. 443, 1858 Md. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-santa-clara-mining-assn-md-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack