Wright v. Rowland

New York Supreme Court

Wright v. Rowland

36 How. Pr. 115

DecidedJune 15, 1868

StatusPublished

This text of 36 How. Pr. 115 (Wright v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Rowland, 36 How. Pr. 115 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

The court

reversed the order appealed from, and discharged the attachment on defendant paying the amount of the judgment within five days—saying, that “judgment,” as defined in the sections of the Code relating to provisional remedies, meant “ a final determination of the rights of the parties to the action,” and that the pendency of the appeal from the judgment did not affect the rights of the defendant to have the attachment discharged. No written opinion was given.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court

reversed the order appealed from, and discharged the attachment on defendant paying the amount of the judgment within five days—saying, that “judgment,” as defined in the sections of the Code relating to provisional remedies, meant “ a final determination of the rights of the parties to the action,” and that the pendency of the appeal from the judgment did not affect the rights of the defendant to have the attachment discharged. No written opinion was given.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 How. Pr. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-rowland-nysupct-1868.