Wright v. Rogers

3 N.J.L. 547

Opinion

By the Court.

— We do not think this a sufficient ground to reverse the judgment. The contents of the paper does not appear; if it was part of the pleadings it was proper the jury should have it j at all events, the facts do not furnish such a case of illegal practice in the plaintiff below, as to justify the interference of this Court, by way of reversal.

Judgment affirmed.