Wright v. Richmond County Department of Health
This text of 186 S.E. 815 (Wright v. Richmond County Department of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The findings of fact by the court in its judgment were authorized by the evidence in the case.
2. The court did not err in holding that “the provision of the ordinance requiring those selling ice cream in the City of Augusta to secure a permit from the board of health of that city is reasonable and lawful.” The regulation is not unreasonable, unlawful, or void under our laws and constitution, in view of the relation of milk and its products to the health and physical welfare of many citizens to whom the products referred to are part of their daily food, and whose health would be endangered if those products were not free from all infection.
3. The court, in allowing the amendment to the petition offered by the plaintiffs, properly excepted from this allowance the prayer that “the court, by its decree, direct the Richmond County Department of Health to immediately issue to petitioners a permit from the health officer of the City of Augusta to sell or offer to sell its milk products and ice [652]*652cream in Richmond County.” The court did not err in refusing an injunction. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 S.E. 815, 182 Ga. 651, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-richmond-county-department-of-health-ga-1936.