Wright v. Raleigh Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Wright v. Raleigh Police Department

55 F. App'x 200

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 2003

DocketNo. 02-2048

StatusPublished

This text of 55 F. App'x 200 (Wright v. Raleigh Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Raleigh Police Department, 55 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Wright appeals the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous her civil suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Raleigh Police Dep’t, No. CA-02-392-5-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Wright appeals the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous her civil suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Raleigh Police Dep’t, No. CA-02-392-5-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F. App'x 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-raleigh-police-department-ca4-2003.