Wright v. Pugh

16 Ind. 106, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 32
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 Ind. 106 (Wright v. Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Pugh, 16 Ind. 106, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 32 (Ind. 1861).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for an assessment of damages by the proprietor of an existing mill. The writ for the assessment was issued, the damages assessed under it, and the return made to the next term of the Court. At that term a demurrer was filed to the complaint in the case, the demurrer sustained, and the suit dismissed. The complaint stated facts making a cause of action. The demurrer was wrongly sustained. The complaint was carelessly drawn, but no motion touching it was made. The statute authorizes the writ in [107]*107every case, without exception, where a mill has been erected prior to an assessment. 2 it. S., p. 188. The owner is entitled to have, through this writ, permanent record evidence of the hight to which he has a right to maintain his dam, specified in feet andinches, or otherwise permanently marked; of the fact that the health of the neighborhood will not be injured; that his mill is of public utility; of his right to build embankments, make excavations, &c.

8. Major, for the appellant. J. Coburn, It. I. Walpole, and C. C. Hines, for the appellee.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &e.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sexauer v. Star Milling Co.
90 N.E. 474 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
The Anderson v. Kernodle
54 Ind. 314 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)
Harding v. Funk
8 Kan. 315 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ind. 106, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-pugh-ind-1861.