Home/Nebraska Supreme Court/Wright v. Pfrimmer

Wright v. Pfrimmer

156 N.W. 1060, 99 Neb. 447, 1916 Neb. LEXIS 51
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 4, 1916
DocketNo. 18363
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 156 N.W. 1060 (Wright v. Pfrimmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Pfrimmer, 156 N.W. 1060, 99 Neb. 447, 1916 Neb. LEXIS 51 (Neb. 1916).

Opinions

Barnes, J.

This is a suit to enjoin defendant from using a residence lot in Oimaha for rooming and boarding purposes in alleged violation "of restrictive covenants in her deed. From a decree'granting an injunction, she has appealed.

Plaintiffs are not parties to the conveyance through which defendant acquired title, and their right to an injunction is challenged on the ground that the restrictive covenants do not inure to their benefit. The covenants in question are as follows:

“Subject, however, to * * * the following restrictions and agreements which shall be considered and construed as covenants running with the land for a period-of 25 years from the 17th day of May, A. D. 1909 :
“(1) That for 25 years from the abové date, said prop-: erty shall be used for residence purposes exclusively and there shall only be erected thereon one separate private residence with the necessary stables and other outhouses in connection therewith, the residence herein specified not to include any apartment house, flat or connected house of any description.
“(2) That any residence erected on said property" shall be fronted on Cuming street aiid the front line thereof shall be placed as nearly as practicable in line with the residence now located on west 50 feet of lot 11, block 12, Bernis Park.
“(3) That any residence erected on said property shall cost not less than $3,500.”

The accompanying map is an aid in understanding the facts:

[449]*449

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Egan v. Catholic Bishop of Lincoln
363 N.W.2d 380 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et Ux
361 P.2d 101 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)
Hogue v. Dreeszen
73 N.W.2d 159 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1955)
Rehard v. Rini
128 N.E.2d 451 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1955)
Auerbacher v. Smith
92 A.2d 492 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Toothaker v. Pleasant
288 S.W. 38 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1926)
Dundee Realty Co. v. Nichols
203 N.W. 558 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.W. 1060, 99 Neb. 447, 1916 Neb. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-pfrimmer-neb-1916.