Wright v. Parole Division

132 A.D.2d 821, 517 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49315
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 16, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 132 A.D.2d 821 (Wright v. Parole Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Parole Division, 132 A.D.2d 821, 517 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Harvey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Conway, J.), entered November 7, 1986 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner parole.

Petitioner commenced the instant proceeding in response to a decision by respondent which denied him parole and recommended continued psychological counseling. By order to show cause dated June 25, 1986, Supreme Court directed that a copy of the order, the petition and its supporting papers be served by mail upon respondent and the Attorney-General by [822]*822mailing on or before July 11, 1986. The papers were not mailed by petitioner until July 23, 1986. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition upon the ground that petitioner failed to acquire personal jurisdiction over respondent. The motion was granted and this appeal by petitioner ensued.

Petitioner neither complied with the service requirement nor indicated to Supreme Court that his imprisonment presented obstacles beyond his control which prevented him from complying with the service requirement. Hence, dismissal of the petition for lack of jurisdiction was proper (see, Matter of Alevras v Chairman of N. Y. Bd. of Parole, 118 AD2d 1020, appeal dismissed 68 NY2d 753). Even if we were to consider the merits of petitioner’s contention that he should have been granted release on parole, we would find it meritless since there has been no showing that respondent’s determination was so irrational as to border on impropriety (see, Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69, 77; Matter of Ristau v Hammock, 103 AD2d 944, 945, lv denied 63 NY2d 608).

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Weiss, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glover v. Chief Administrator of the Courts
197 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Gittens v. Selsky
193 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Pacheco v. Selsky
191 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Martin v. Althouse
190 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Baker v. Russi
188 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Bogle v. Coughlin
165 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.2d 821, 517 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-parole-division-nyappdiv-1987.