Wright v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A.

205 So. 3d 889, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18795
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 2016
DocketCase No. 5D16-387
StatusPublished

This text of 205 So. 3d 889 (Wright v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A., 205 So. 3d 889, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration, we affirm the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment. See Sheppard v. State, 151 So.3d 1154, 1171-74 (Fla. 2014); Reaves v. State, 826 So.2d 932, 943-44 (Fla. 2002); Moua v. Pittullo, Howington, Barker, Abernathy, LLP, 228 Cal.App.4th 107, 116-17, 174 Cal.Rptr.3d 662 (2014).

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reaves v. State
826 So. 2d 932 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Moua v. Pittullo, Howington, Barker, Abernathy, LLP CA2/2
228 Cal. App. 4th 107 (California Court of Appeal, 2014)
Billy Jim Sheppard, Jr. v. State of Florida
151 So. 3d 1154 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 So. 3d 889, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-morgan-morgan-pa-fladistctapp-2016.