Wright v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A.

205 So. 3d 889, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18795
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 2016·No. Case No. 5D16-387·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration, we affirm the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment. See Sheppard v. State, 151 So.3d 1154, 1171-74 (Fla. 2014); Reaves v. State, 826 So.2d 932, 943-44 (Fla. 2002); Moua v. Pittullo, Howington, Barker, Abernathy, LLP, 228 Cal.App.4th 107, 116-17, 174 Cal.Rptr.3d 662 (2014).

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A., 205 So. 3d 889, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

205 So. 3d 889 (Wright v. Morgan & Morgan, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reaves v. State
826 So. 2d 932 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Moua v. Pittullo, Howington, Barker, Abernathy, LLP CA2/2
228 Cal. App. 4th 107 (California Court of Appeal, 2014)
Billy Jim Sheppard, Jr. v. State of Florida
151 So. 3d 1154 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)