Home/Supreme Court/Wright v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.

Wright v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.

349 U.S. 935, 75 S. Ct. 785, 99 L. Ed. 1264, 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 1209, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 774
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 23, 1955
DocketNo. 727
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 349 U.S. 935 (Wright v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp., 349 U.S. 935, 75 S. Ct. 785, 99 L. Ed. 1264, 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 1209, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 774 (1955).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Illinois. The motion that cause pro[936]*936ceed with Warren E. Wright as one of the petitioners is granted. Certiorari denied.

Latham Castle, Attorney-General of Illinois, John L. Davidson, Jr., First Assistant Attorney General, William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, and Richard L. Cooper, Special Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners. William A. Dougherty, James Lawrence White, John H. Hendren, Norman J. Gundlach and Arthur W. Manley for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
123 So. 2d 172 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
State v. Plantation Pipe Line Company
89 So. 2d 549 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 U.S. 935, 75 S. Ct. 785, 99 L. Ed. 1264, 4 Oil & Gas Rep. 1209, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-mississippi-river-fuel-corp-scotus-1955.