Wright v. Middleton

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 11, 1774
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622 (Wright v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Middleton, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1774).

Opinion

This Cause coming on this Day to be heard on Bill of Revivor and Answer, Mr. Charles Cotesworth Pinckney opened the Nature and Scope of the Bill and Mr. Rutledge the Nature and Scope of the Answer The Court then on hearing Counsel on both Sides did Order and decree That the Complainant Alexander and Elizabeth his Wife are now well intitled to all and singular the Estate Real and personal of the said John Izard deceased and the part or share of the Real and personal Estate of the said Paul Jenys deceased particularly mentioned in the pleadings in this Cause And that a Settlement and conveyance of such real and personal Estate as is herein after specified which is computed to be of the value of Twenty Thousand pounds Sterling money of Great Britain be made and [blank].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-middleton-ctchansc-1774.