Wright v. Metropolitan Dade County

547 So. 2d 304, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1876, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4492, 1989 WL 88056
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 1989·No. No. 89-611·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who were plaintiffs below, appeal an adverse summary judgment in their suit against Metropolitan Dade County for injuries sustained in an automobile intersection collision. The traffic light had malfunctioned so that it displayed either a continuous red signal or a flashing red signal. After plaintiffs halted, they attempted to cross the multi-lane intersection, in the course of which they were struck by a motorist having the right of way. Plaintiffs brought suit against Metropolitan Dade County alleging that their injuries were caused by negligent operation, maintenance and repair of the traffic signal. We concur with the trial court that Metropolitan Dade County v. Colina, 456 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), review denied, 464 So.2d 554 (Fla.1985), is dispositive and affirm the summary judgment in favor of the county.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Metropolitan Dade County, 547 So. 2d 304, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1876, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4492, 1989 WL 88056 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

547 So. 2d 304 (Wright v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levy v. Florida Power & Light Co.
798 So. 2d 778 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Batista v. City of Miami
780 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)