Wright v. McMillan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Wright v. McMillan

30 F. Cas. 679, 13 O.G. 47

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri·Decided November 15, 1877·Published

Opinion

KREKEL, District Judge.

This cause came on to be heard at this term, and was argued by counsel; and thereupon, on consideration thereof, it was ordered, adjudged, and decreed.that the complainant’s bill be dismissed, and that said defendant, Roland McMillan, recover against the complainant, Ethan B. Wright, and Isaac R. Brown, his security, for costs, his costs and charges herein expended, and have thereof execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KREKEL, District Judge.

This cause came on to be heard at this term, and was argued by counsel; and thereupon, on consideration thereof, it was ordered, adjudged, and decreed.that the complainant’s bill be dismissed, and that said defendant, Roland McMillan, recover against the complainant, Ethan B. Wright, and Isaac R. Brown, his security, for costs, his costs and charges herein expended, and have thereof execution.

Wright v. McMillan, 30 F. Cas. 679, 13 O.G. 47 (circtwdmo 1877).

Pincite

30 F. Cas. 679 (Wright v. McMillan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.