Wright v. McMillan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Wright v. McMillan

30 F. Cas. 679, 13 O.G. 47

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

DecidedNovember 15, 1877

StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. Cas. 679 (Wright v. McMillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. McMillan, 30 F. Cas. 679, 13 O.G. 47 (circtwdmo 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

KREKEL, District Judge.

This cause came on to be heard at this term, and was argued by counsel; and thereupon, on consideration thereof, it was ordered, adjudged, and decreed.that the complainant’s bill be dismissed, and that said defendant, Roland McMillan, recover against the complainant, Ethan B. Wright, and Isaac R. Brown, his security, for costs, his costs and charges herein expended, and have thereof execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KREKEL, District Judge.

This cause came on to be heard at this term, and was argued by counsel; and thereupon, on consideration thereof, it was ordered, adjudged, and decreed.that the complainant’s bill be dismissed, and that said defendant, Roland McMillan, recover against the complainant, Ethan B. Wright, and Isaac R. Brown, his security, for costs, his costs and charges herein expended, and have thereof execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. Cas. 679, 13 O.G. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-mcmillan-circtwdmo-1877.