Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light

938 So. 2d 61, 2006 WL 2882589
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 6, 2006
Docket2006-C-1181
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 938 So. 2d 61 (Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 938 So. 2d 61, 2006 WL 2882589 (La. 2006).

Opinion

938 So.2d 61 (2006)

Betty Jo H. WRIGHT, Individually and as Natural Tutrix on Behalf of the Minor Child, Peter B. Wright, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Ned D. Wright, and Ned D. Wright, Jr.
v.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT, Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., and Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft.
Betty Jo H. Harris, a/k/a Betty Jo H. Wright, Individually and as Natural Tutrix on Behalf of the Minor Child, Peter B. Wright, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Ned D. Wright, and Ned D. Wright, Jr.
v.
DaimlerChrysler Aktiengesellschaft, Formerly Known as Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC., Formerly Known as Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., Bernard Cassisa, Elliott & Davis, and Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, LLP.

No. 2006-C-1181.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 6, 2006.

Granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light
951 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
938 So. 2d 61, 2006 WL 2882589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-louisiana-power-light-la-2006.