Wright v. Levis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wright v. Levis

93 A. 946, 248 Pa. 206, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 546

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 15, 1915

DocketAppeal, No. 353

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 A. 946 (Wright v. Levis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Levis, 93 A. 946, 248 Pa. 206, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 546 (Pa. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned court below found as a fact “this suit was brought against William Levis, Incorporated, but the testimony, as well as the written contracts, shows that the agreement was made between George Wright and William Levis, individually, disconnected with the corporation.” Under this finding and the other findings of fact by -the learned chancellor, the bill was properly dismissed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The learned court below found as a fact “this suit was brought against William Levis, Incorporated, but the testimony, as well as the written contracts, shows that the agreement was made between George Wright and William Levis, individually, disconnected with the corporation.” Under this finding and the other findings of fact by -the learned chancellor, the bill was properly dismissed.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A. 946, 248 Pa. 206, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-levis-pa-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack