Wright v. Le Brasseur

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Wright v. Le Brasseur

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 288

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided March 28, 1722·Published

Opinion

It is mutually Agreed by and between the Sollicitors of the Parties Complainant and Defendant That after the examination of the Witnesses on the Interrogatorys, either party shall be at liberty to examine and cross-examine the same, or any other Witnesses Viva Voce before the Master and Auditors, or at the hearing of the Cause on notice in writing given to each Party to attend (if they shall think fit) and that the Depositions be reduced into writing, if required by either Party.

Intr.

Thos Lamboll Deputy Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is mutually Agreed by and between the Sollicitors of the Parties Complainant and Defendant That after the examination of the Witnesses on the Interrogatorys, either party shall be at liberty to examine and cross-examine the same, or any other Witnesses Viva Voce before the Master and Auditors, or at the hearing of the Cause on notice in writing given to each Party to attend (if they shall think fit) and that the Depositions be reduced into writing, if required by either Party.

Intr.

Thos Lamboll Deputy Register

Wright v. Le Brasseur, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 288 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1722).

Pincite

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 288 (Wright v. Le Brasseur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.