Wright v. Keene

268 P. 545, 82 Mont. 603, 60 A.L.R. 109, 1928 Mont. LEXIS 103
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 28, 1928
DocketNo. 6,328.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 268 P. 545 (Wright v. Keene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Keene, 268 P. 545, 82 Mont. 603, 60 A.L.R. 109, 1928 Mont. LEXIS 103 (Mo. 1928).

Opinion

*606 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CALLAWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was brought by the plaintiff as receiver of the First National Bank of Townsend to recover from the defendant, alleged to be a shareholder, an amount due upon an assessment made on the shareholders of the bank by the comptroller of the currency. The court rendered judgment for plaintiff and defendant appealed.

It appears that in 1912 H. L. Keene was the owner of ten shares of the capital stock of the First National Bank of Townsend, referred to hereafter as the bank. Mr. Keene, during that year, wrote upon the back of the certificate which evidenced his ownership of the shares an assignment thereof to Gray P. Keene, his son; therein he authorized the president of the bank to transfer the stock on the books of the association; but he retained possession of the certificate until October, 1922, when he gave it to Gray P. Keene telling him to lay it away and keep it but not to present it to the bank for transfer while he, II. L. Keene, was living. The old gentleman desired to retain the title during his lifetime. He died in December, 1922. In January, 1923, Gray P. Keene became administrator of his father’s estate, and during that month he *607 presented the certificate to the president and cashier of the bank and demanded that the shares be transferred to him personally upon the books. The officers refused to make the transfer. Defendant did nothing further respecting the matter. The bank carried on its business until January, 1925, when plaintiff, as receiver, under appointment of the comptroller of the currency, closed its doors and proceeded with winding up its affairs. In February, 1925, the comptroller levied an assessment of $100 on each and every share of the capital stock of the bank and pursuant thereto plaintiff demanded of defendant, as administrator of the estate of H. L. Keene, deceased, the sum of $1,000. During the winding up of the -bank’s affairs three dividends were paid. Cheeks for these, amounting to $111.38 in the aggregate, were made out in favor of the-defendant, as administrator; these defendant indorsed to the receiver and the several amounts were credited upon the assessment. The balance due, $888.62, being unpaid, the receiver brought this suit against the defendant personally alleging him to be the real owner of the shares of stock which stood on the books of the bank in the name of H. L. Keene.

The essential question for decision is whether, as the defendant did not appear to be the owner of the shares upon the bank’s books, he can be held liable for the assessment.

The court found that at the time the bank failed the defendant was, and ever after continued to be, the owner and holder of ten shares of the capital stock of the bank of a par value of $1,000. The evidence amply sustains the finding.

Section 5139 of the Kevised Statutes of the United States provides that the capital stock of a national banking association shall be divided into shares of $100 each, and be deemed personal property, and transferable on the books of the association in such manner as may be prescribed in the by-laws or articles of association; that every person becoming a shareholder by such transfer shall, in proportion of his shares, succeed to all the rights and liabilities of the prior holder of *608 such shares; and that no change shall foe made in the articles of association by which the rights, remedies or securities of the existing creditors of the association shall be impaired.

Nevertheless, national bank stock is salable and transferable at the will of the owner as is other personal property. “The authority to prescribe the manner of the transfer permits only conditions which are essential to the protection of the association against transfers which are fraudulent or which may be designed to evade the just responsibility of the stockholder. It was enacted for the benefit of the corporation, its stockholders, and its creditors only. As to all other parties a transfer of such stock which is good at common law is good under the statute. As between the parties the title to the stock is acquired by the seller’s delivery of his certificate thereof to the purchaser, indorsed or assigned in the usual 'manner, and either party may compel the registration and transfer of the stock on the books of the bank.” (7 C. J. 766, and see 3 K. C. L. 388.)

Section 5151, Kevised Statutes of the United States, pro- vides that the shareholders of every national banking association shall be held individually responsible, equally and ratably, and not one for the other, for all contracts, debts and engagements of such association, to the extent of the amount of their stock therein, at the par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in such shares.

The question has arisen frequently as to what constitutes a shareholder. The cases have arisen under varying circumstances but usually from the efforts of shareholders to escape liability by transferring their stock to others. As a general rule, the individual liability of a shareholder continues until there is a transfer of the stock on the books of the bank. To this rule there are exceptions which need not be stated here for the reason that the liability of the estate of H. L. Keene, deceased, is not involved in this case. (See Matteson v. Dent, 176 U. S. 521, 44 L. Ed. 571, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; 7 C. J. 771.)

*609 In Richmond v. Irons, 121 U. S. 27, 30 L. Ed. 864, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 788, is found the following: “Those persons only have the rights and liabilities of stockholders who appear to be such, as are registered on the books of the association, the stock being transferable only in that way. No person becomes a shareholder subject to such liabilities and succeeding to such rights except by such transfer; until such transfer the prior holder is a stockholder for all purposes of the law.” But this pronouncement has not been followed in its entirety. On the contrary, in Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co., 165 U. S. 606, 41 L. Ed. 844, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 465, the court deduced certain rules relating to the liability of stockholders of national banking associations of which the first is: “That the real owner of the shares of the capital stock of a national banking association, may, in every case, be treated as a shareholder within the meaning of section 5151.” While it is true that, generally speaking, the registered owner of shares of stock can be charged with the statutory liability it does not follow that the real owner of the stock may not likewise be charged. (Davis v. Stevens, 17 Blatchf. 259; 7 Fed. Cas. 3653, opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Waite.) In Houghton v. Hubbell, 91 Fed. 453, 33 C. C. A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pedersen v. Brantner
503 S.W.2d 25 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1973)
Hageman v. First National Bank of Denver
514 P.2d 328 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1973)
Swan v. Morgan
22 F. Supp. 654 (N.D. West Virginia, 1938)
Security State Bank v. O'Connor
276 N.W. 249 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1937)
Andrew v. Citizens State Bank
261 N.W. 810 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1935)
Fors v. Farrell
260 N.W. 886 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Fitzpatrick's Gdn. v. 1st Nat. Bk. Whitesburg's Rec.
75 S.W.2d 754 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)
Greenwood v. Cochrane
171 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Midwest State Bank v. Sandidge
291 P. 766 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 P. 545, 82 Mont. 603, 60 A.L.R. 109, 1928 Mont. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-keene-mont-1928.